cc Julie Burchill,
Allison Pearson, Suzanne Moore, Richard Littlejohn, Nick Cohen, Jan
Moir & Peter Hitchens (sorry if I missed anyone, please forward).
Dear Mr Young
I write in praise of
your courageous decision to re-publish Julie Burchill's so-called
"controversial" attack on transgendered people. As you
said, the Observer's decision to censor Ms Burchill was a disgrace,
and it is good to know there are men such as yourself willing to
stand firm against The Politically Correct Brigade. As you also
wrote: "It cannot be said often enough
that freedom of speech, if it means anything, must include the
freedom to say things that some people find offensive."
How true -- and for
too long Britain's newspaper columnists have been denied that
freedom. Why, it is almost impossible these days to read an article
attacking homosexuals or immigrants or Muslims or the unemployed or
single mothers or women in general - and now it seems that the brave
journalists of Fleet Street must cower in the face of a new enemy:
the fearsome Trans Lobby. A monstrous cabal of highly influential
"people" with the power to literally cut off the livlihood
of anyone who "offends" them.
Where will it end?
Today, you are not allowed to call transsexuals "a bunch of
bed-wetters in bad wigs" (unless you have a friend who has a
blog at the Telegraph who will host your article after it has been
taken down). Tomorrow, perhaps you will not be allowed to say
anything at all! As your colleague Richard Littlejohn likes to point
out: "You couldn't make it up!"
This is, at heart, an
issue of freedom of speech. No matter how much the Screaming Mimis
may claim it's more about the danger of legitimising hatred against
vulnerable minorities, you and I and Jan Moir know that what's really
at stake is the right of journalists to pour scorn on people they
despise.
And so we come to my
proposal. Mister Young, you are a valiant man, and a man of
integrity. You have shown this in your championing of Ms Burchill,
and I feel sure you are a man who has said on more than one occasion
"I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the
death your right to say it (and also publish it on my blog)".
And so I ask you this:
Will you please publish
my article that I have wrote about The Jews? Specifically it is about
how The Jews use the black man and the brown man and the homosexual
to try to tear down our once great nation, and if anyone tries to
expose their malevolent plot they have him silenced. I have spent a
great deal of time coming up with some phrases to describe The Jews
(and their familiars), and I think some of the funny combinations of
words I have achieved will amuse you.
Of course my article
will "offend" the do-gooders and the moaning minnies and
the professionally outraged, and the Zionists will accuse you and me
of anti-semitism and they'll be right but that shouldn't matter. All
that matters is freedom of speech, which of course means the freedom
to publish exactly whatever you want in a national newspaper.
My only other option to
get my words out to the masses will be to start a thread on
Stormfront (or any one of the many other American-hosted hate sites
the internet permits to thirve), but before doing that I wanted to give you
the chance to support me. As I support you, mein fuhrer.
Yours in comradeship
(and shared hatred of The Jew?)
Carlos Spenkenhauser Shitforbrains III
2 comments:
Love it.
It's a curious, self-serving argument, isn't it? I see Suzanne Moore has tried another in the Guardian today. Apparently, 'equality' is now in opposition to 'freedom' - by which she seems to mean that people arguing for equality are somehow infringing on Moore's right to be opposed to it.
It's just a bizarrely thoughtless variation on the old 'I am entitled to my opinion' line. Yes, yes, you are. We all are. But never without challenge or consequence.
Post a Comment